OPPO Reno 16F vs Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro
Our Verdict: There's more battery in the OPPO Reno 16F, 7000mAh to 4350mAh, which usually means longer between charges, and storage goes higher on the Reno 16F, up to 512GB against 128GB. The Reno 16F uses an OLED panel, which gives it richer contrast than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro's LCD, and the Reno 16F is the lighter phone at 195g against 240g. The Reno 16F doesn't just win on price; it holds its own on specs too, which makes it the easy pick unless something specific draws you to the Galaxy XCover 7 Pro.
If you'd rather pay up front, the Reno 16F is the cheaper buy at £477 SIM-free.
OPPO Reno 16F
|
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Screen | 6.57" | 6.6" |
| Display | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2372 | 1080 x 2408 |
| Pixels Per Inch | 397 | 400 |
| Rear Camera | 50 Megapixels | 50 Megapixels |
| Front Camera | 50 Megapixels | 13 Megapixels |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| Battery | 7,000 mAh | 4,350 mAh |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| SIM Type | Nano SIM | nano-SIM and e-SIM |
| Connectivity | Up to 5G | Up to 5G |
| Wi-Fi | 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 | 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Dimensions | 158.2 x 74.5 x 8.4 mm | 168.6 x 79.9 x 10.2 mm |
| Weight | 195 grams | 240 grams |
| Water Resistance | IP68/IP69K dust tight and water resistant (high pressure water jets; immersible up to 1.5m for 30 mi | IP68 - Dust and water resistant over 1.5 meter and 30 minutes |
| Contracts |
£14.99/mo
£79.00 upfront |
- |
| SIM-free | £477.00 | £559.00 |
| Deals | Deals |
Cheapest Deals
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has the better screen, the OPPO Reno 16F or Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro?
Both phones have a similar screen size at around 6.6", both screens are similarly sharp at around 397 pixels per inch, and the OPPO Reno 16F uses a AMOLED panel while the Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro has a IPS LCD.
Which has the better camera, the OPPO Reno 16F or Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16F features a 50 Megapixels rear camera, while the Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro has a 50 Megapixels rear camera. Both devices also have front-facing cameras for selfies and video calls.
Which is cheaper to buy SIM-free, the OPPO Reno 16F or Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16F is cheaper SIM-free, starting from £477.00.
What storage options are available for the OPPO Reno 16F and Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16F is available in 512GB, while the Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro comes in 128GB.
What processors do the OPPO Reno 16F and Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro use?
The OPPO Reno 16F is powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm), while the Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro uses the Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4 nm).
Which is easier to carry and hold, the OPPO Reno 16F or Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16F is the more portable of the two: it's 45g lighter at 195 grams, it's also the more compact phone at 158.2 x 74.5 x 8.4 mm, and is slimmer at 8.4mm thick.
Which is more water resistant, the OPPO Reno 16F or Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16F is rated IP68/IP69K dust tight and water resistant (high pressure water jets; immersible up to 1.5m for 30 mi, while the Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro is rated IP68 - Dust and water resistant over 1.5 meter and 30 minutes.
What operating system do the OPPO Reno 16F and Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro run?
The OPPO Reno 16F runs Android 16 and the Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro runs Android 15. This is one of the biggest factors when choosing between the two, as each ecosystem has its own apps, services and features.