OPPO Reno 16F vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition
Our Verdict: The OPPO Reno 16F has the bigger battery of the two, 7000mAh against 4000mAh, which usually means longer between charges, and the Reno 16F has the bigger screen at 6.6" against 6.2", while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition has the sharper one at 416 PPI. The Reno 16F goes up to 512GB of storage, where the S25 Enterprise Edition tops out at 128GB, and the S25 Enterprise Edition is the lighter phone at 162g against 195g. The Reno 16F doesn't just win on price; it holds its own on specs too, which makes it the easy pick unless something specific draws you to the S25 Enterprise Edition.
If you'd rather pay up front, the Reno 16F is the cheaper buy at £477 SIM-free.
Prices updated 27 July 2026
OPPO Reno 16F
|
Samsung Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Screen | 6.57" | 6.2" |
| Display | AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2372 | 1080 x 2340 |
| Pixels Per Inch | 397 | 416 |
| Rear Camera | 50 Megapixels | 50 Megapixels |
| Front Camera | 50 Megapixels | 12 Megapixels |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) |
| Battery | 7,000 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| SIM Type | Nano SIM | nano-SIM and e-SIM |
| Connectivity | Up to 5G | Up to 5G |
| Wi-Fi | 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 | 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Dimensions | 158.2 x 74.5 x 8.4 mm | 146.9 x 70.4 x 7.2 mm |
| Weight | 195 grams | 162 grams |
| Water Resistance | IP68/IP69K dust tight and water resistant (high pressure water jets; immersible up to 1.5m for 30 mi | IP68 - Dust and water resistant over 1.5 meter and 30 minutes |
| Contracts | - | - |
| SIM-free | £477.00 | £549.00 |
| Prices updated 27 July 2026 | ||
| Deals | Deals | |
Cheapest Deals
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has the better screen, the OPPO Reno 16F or Samsung Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition?
The OPPO Reno 16F has the bigger screen at 6.6" compared to the Samsung Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition's 6.2", the Samsung Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition has the sharper display at 416 pixels per inch versus 397, and the OPPO Reno 16F uses a AMOLED panel while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition has a Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X.
Which has the better camera, the OPPO Reno 16F or Samsung Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition?
The OPPO Reno 16F features a 50 Megapixels rear camera, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition has a 50 Megapixels rear camera. Both devices also have front-facing cameras for selfies and video calls.
Which is cheaper to buy SIM-free, the OPPO Reno 16F or Samsung Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition?
The OPPO Reno 16F is cheaper SIM-free, starting from £477.00.
What storage options are available for the OPPO Reno 16F and Samsung Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition?
The OPPO Reno 16F is available in 512GB, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition comes in 128GB.
What processors do the OPPO Reno 16F and Samsung Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition use?
The OPPO Reno 16F is powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm), while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition uses the Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm).
Which is easier to carry and hold, the OPPO Reno 16F or Samsung Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition is the more portable of the two: it's 33g lighter at 162 grams, it's also the more compact phone at 146.9 x 70.4 x 7.2 mm, and is slimmer at 7.2mm thick.
Which is more water resistant, the OPPO Reno 16F or Samsung Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition?
The OPPO Reno 16F is rated IP68/IP69K dust tight and water resistant (high pressure water jets; immersible up to 1.5m for 30 mi, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition is rated IP68 - Dust and water resistant over 1.5 meter and 30 minutes.
What operating system do the OPPO Reno 16F and Samsung Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition run?
The OPPO Reno 16F runs Android 16 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Enterprise Edition runs Android 15. This is one of the biggest factors when choosing between the two, as each ecosystem has its own apps, services and features.